![]() ![]() ![]() These challenges also burden election officials, who must expend time reviewing them.ĭatabases that contain information like names and birthdates are not without error or inconsistency. These challenges threaten to disenfranchise eligible voters or force them to cast provisional ballots, which can put strains on supplies and lines at the polls and also provide fodder for further specious challenges. So far, we have seen this practice lead to mass challenges to voter eligibility in states including Michigan and Georgia. In doing so, they are cobbling together incomplete datasets that can later become “evidence” for candidates to baselessly challenge the legitimacy of the election if they lose.Īmateur data matching pitfalls and how it may be used to challenge election outcomes They are using National Change of Address lists, tax assessor data, a portal operated by government contractor Schneider Geospatial, public map services, and public voter data from multiple states to make inferences about current voter eligibility and past election legitimacy. ![]() They use National Change of Address registries to flag voters who may have permanently moved to another jurisdiction, which they then confirm by sending postcards.Īctivists are being encouraged by those who claim the 2020 election was “stolen” to perform their own amateur data matching. They engage in data matching with special processes to avoid removing any eligible voters from the rolls. And it proposes ways to curb the risks that these practices pose to election administration.ĭata matching is an important tool used by election officials to verify the identity of newly registered voters or practice list maintenance - the periodic practice of clearing out registrants who are no longer eligible to vote in the jurisdiction. This resource aims to preempt any effort to use deceptive, dangerous, and deeply flawed methods to challenge election results or cast doubt on the security of American elections after November 8. ![]() The methods used by the groups behind these initiatives have reached worrisome levels of coordination and commonality in 2022. The groups seek to exploit members of the public who have been falsely told the 2020 election was “stolen” and that these types of efforts can prevent it from happening again. Similar attempts have existed in recent election cycles, but this year’s efforts follow a two-year disinformation campaign to cast doubt on President Biden’s victory. These groups’ efforts might also produce material that they can use to concoct false claims to challenge the 2022 election results and further undermine confidence in American elections. They burden election workers who must respond to the conspiracy-laden claims that result, and they risk intimidating voters and propelling mass challenges that could disenfranchise rightful voters. These error-ridden practices can disenfranchise eligible voters and strain election official resources.ĭriven by well-funded organizations like the Conservative Partnership Institute, new networks have spun once-fringe grassroots groups into an interconnected web awash in misinformation. They have organized to engage in practices like amateur data matching with voter rolls, door-to-door canvassing to compare residents’ statements with voter records, and surveillance of mail ballot drop boxes. In some states, election deniers motivated by false claims of widespread fraud in the 2020 election are engaging in their own, deeply flawed investigations to substantiate myths of widespread voter fraud. Attend the Brennan Legacy Awards Dinner.Advance Constitutional Change Show / hide.National Task Force on Democracy Reform & the Rule of Law.Government Targeting of Minority Communities Show / hide.Campaign Finance in the Courts Show / hide.Gerrymandering & Fair Representation Show / hide.Ensure Every American Can Vote Show / hide. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |